Waste Management
For us, this is rather a long-standing and lasting impasse rather than an additional source of revenue for private companies independent of the State. The ICUs of all mosses that have been concentrating on this count of urban UCL since the " collaborative Soviet essay " in their hands seem to be able to share " with an independent business part of " martyrdom " . However, in the initial phase, the processing of the tilting requires major investments. Therefore, the " conquest " of urban landfills by private companies is postponed to known " best times " . "No money," we say, but by imploding into the land, we're in the dark.According to the average environmental estimates, the city with a population of about 1 million is throwing up to 400,000 tons of garbage per year in adjacent areas. Waste (and these are potential " candidates " under " roads " ) has two ways in modern Russian realities: landfill and incineration. The term " reprocessing " has so far been known only by enthusiasm. Both of these routes have traditionally been " occupied " by municipalities. Understanding that debris is also a business, and very profitable, comes slowly to private companies. In the West, every trash bag is on a strict account. Accordingly, in Germany, large enterprises calculate their incomes in billions of euros, as for small companies, for example, Victor (e.g., e.g., e.g., e.g., e.g., in the state of 19, has an annual turnover of up to Euro10,000. The geographical area of the Old Light countries is small, and it is therefore endeavouring to preserve and use it to the maximum: for example, to find the use of raw materials already used. Thus, two borrowers were killed: private companies provided good income and did good work, protecting the environment from harmful waste. In Russia, pioneer companies are moving in the area of undiscovered util-horizons solely “for a sense”. In Sverdlov province, " flourishing " business is only gaining momentum. When there is a strong demand, then there will be further development, Igor Babin, head of the Elys (GS) is of the view thatgarbage processing and removal in Lower Tagil. The question is " priced " because of the prevailing monopoly on official management structures. It appears that the long-standing and seemingly strong traditions of the FCC-structure have led to " running around " and the authorities themselves and private business. The IUPU on the list of organizations involved in the removal and disposal of debris is much larger than the various GS and OAOs. The businessmen say, "It's expensive to start! Initial investment in the construction of TBT (solid domestic waste) is, say, large enough. In the Chelabin region, a project to launch such an enterprise was considered in 2007: at least a billion roubles were needed to build a polygon. According to Vladimir Znamerovsky, Chief of Environmental Management of the Chelabinsk Administration, a minimum of two years will go to various hydrological studies. The purchase of money in the polygon is, in practice, possible in the production of heat and gas for industrial and private consumers. According to the modest calculations, the profitability of the production of raw materials from waste disposal will be at least 17 per cent. But there are a few things to wait for " peripheral " interest: the majority today still prefers oil business as a quick and end-of-life option.
In the domestic context, the creation of " flour " business is more profitable to earn a partial reprocessing of the utils. The Executive Director of the private capital company, Drobus, specializing in the authorcycling (mobile refining), Sergey Elders, notes that the profitability of a well-established authorcycling business can be between 30 and 40 per cent. Today, for the disposal of one light machine, the capital budget pays about 1,000 roubles, a truck worth just over 1 and a half thousand. Over the year, the enterprise will dispose of up to 1,000 units of equipment worth million roubles. A small " bonus " is the proceeds of the resale of spare parts.
Ural mapThere are about 600 TBT landfills on Ural now, of which only 71 have clearance documents, the remainder work with all possible violations. More than 200 unauthorized landfills and natural dumps were found in and around Catherineburg. In the capital city of Ural, there are only polygons for the disposal of waste 4th and 3rd degrees, the safest materials. These include, for example, domestic equipment, counterfeit audio and video products. And all of this can be reintroduced. The most important aspect of all operations is money. Citizens pay for the recycling of garbage and ecologically clean " habitat " , entrepreneurs earn profits on " clean-up " of this environment, which is the ideal course of action. Ecologists and economists are united in the view that the civil and business community should establish an undisclosure principle: minimum household waste and maximum recycling, including reuse. Consumers take care of the sorting of household waste, factories recycle it, and the Government is the focal point for the process. At the moment, the Urban Businessmen have one voice saying that they are willing to engage in " marsor " , the case is profitable, but " waiting " money will have to take again for a minimum of 1, 5 years. The State does not particularly seek to assist start-up entrepreneurs at the start-up, and processing plants now live under the rubric of “municipal property”. According to Vladimir Fomin, the head of Ecotormas (TBO processing equipment): " It must be borne in mind that recycling and related industries are not by-production or serial production. In fact, our work is a labour-intensive process, the garbage needs to be handled very seriously today, but it is not entirely beneficial for private organizations. There is little activity in this segment of non-State companies in Ural, but the administration has not been too inclined to engage in productive dialogue with us; support is needed and is virtually non-existent. " COMMENTSSergei Aleksandrovich Archipov, Chairman of the Ecological and Environmental Management Committee of the Ekaterinburgh Administration For the majority, it is easier to put money into the bank and get dividends from them than to invest in the muser and wait 15 years until the profit starts. A minimum of five years is the cost of buying projects built on recycling. Should we also consider what product we are going to take: aluminium bank or " hard " plastic? It's completely different. For example, at the municipal level, we have organized the processing of daylight lamps, which is a rather problematic procedure, as these lamps contain mercury.With regard to businessmen, every week, some people come to me and say, " We want to process something " . I answer to them: " All right, let's help you just what? " , they say, "Give us land and money." So the man wants us to organize the production, and he'll come and make the money. At a very serious level, such documents come: " Consider the allocation of funds " . But who's gonna put the money in the budget? If there was a certain coefficient, of course, we would help all. All waste is profitable! If properly installed, up to 15 different components can be obtained. Of course, first we need to buy equipment, go to the zero, and then start earning. And with a reasonable question, we are willing to help the business, and we are willing to amend the law as well. There's nothing more businessmen can do about it.
|
Related posts: